Study by SIDN Labs and UT shows Dutch government DNS infrastructure is sound
Researchers recommend central secondary anycast
Chose your color
Frequently visited
Frequently asked questions
The Whois is an easy-to-use tool for checking the availability of a .nl domain name. If the domain name is already taken, you can see who has registered it.
On the page looking up a domain name you will find more information about what a domain name is, how the Whois works and how the privacy of personal data is protected. Alternatively, you can go straight to look for a domain name via the Whois.
To get your domain name transferred, you need the token (unique ID number) for your domain name. Your existing registrar has the token and is obliged to give it to you within five days, if you ask for it. The procedure for changing your registrar is described on the page transferring your domain name.
To update the contact details associated with your domain name, you need to contact your registrar. Read more about updating contact details.
When a domain name is cancelled, we aren't told the reason, so we can't tell you. You'll need to ask your registrar. The advantage of quarantine is that, if a name's cancelled by mistake, you can always get it back.
One common reason is that the contract between you and your registrar says you've got to renew the registration every year. If you haven't set up automatic renewal and you don't renew manually, the registration will expire.
Wanneer je een klacht hebt over of een geschil met je registrar dan zijn er verschillende mogelijkheden om tot een oplossing te komen. Hierover lees je meer op pagina klacht over registrar. SIDN heeft geen formele klachtenprocedure voor het behandelen van een klacht over jouw registrar.
Would you like to be able to register domain names for customers or for your own organisation by dealing directly with SIDN? If so, you can become a .nl registrar. Read more about the conditions and how to apply for registrar status on the page becoming a registrar.
Researchers recommend central secondary anycast
The Dutch government's DNS infrastructure is generally sound, according to a study by SIDN Labs and the University of Twente (UT) for the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). The researchers nevertheless recommended a number of improvements, such as setting up a central secondary anycast system to optimise availability. The resilience of the Dutch government's DNS infrastructure was also assessed, and found to be comparable with the Swedish, Swiss and US government set-ups.
The NCSC commissioned the research because it wanted to learn more about current best practices for DNS availability. The Centre was also interested to hear whether the current set-up could be improved. SIDN Labs and UT were chosen to undertake the study because of their track records and expertise in the field of DNS, DNS infrastructures and associated security and stability testing [RFC 9199]. Logius was also involved to compile accurate lists of government domain names.
The researchers from SIDN Labs and UT concluded that the Dutch government's DNS infrastructure is generally sound. Their main recommendation was that the government should use a number of internal and/or external DNS service providers, rather than relying on one. Establishment of a central secondary anycast infrastructure was also proposed. Finally, the research team advised periodic scanning of the government's DNS set-up. That would help exclude minor configuration errors, a number of which were detected by the study. The exclusion of minor problems – references to non-existent servers and instances of primary and secondary servers being on the same network, for example – is desirable because they can impair performance or diminish redundancy. Periodic scanning would promote early detection and correction, the researchers reasoned.
On the basis of their first scan findings, the SIDN Labs-UT team compared the resilience of the Dutch government's DNS infrastructure with the Swedish, Swiss and US government systems. Their conclusion was that all 4 countries were broadly on a par. The peer-reviewed results of the comparative study [PDF] were recently presented at a major academic symposium, the 18th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM2022). In May, the study is also due to be presented at RIPE 86 in Rotterdam, a gathering for internet service providers, network operators and other stakeholders from all over the world. The NCSC has also published a (Dutch) press release about the research.
Contact person:
Share this article